|
An Arbitrage Guide to Financial Markets
By Robert Dubil
Sample Pages
4 Equities, Currencies, and
Commodities
Spot markets in securities other than
fixed income are simpler and more
complex at the same time. The underlying
mathematics are much simpler because
these securities do not normally involve
multiple cash flows (a currency does not
pay coupons like a bond) and there are
few or no close substitutes that can be
repackaged to create a stock, a
currency, or a commodity (like coupon
bonds with zeros). Each spot currency or
stock is unique and its value cannot be
mathematically related to that of
another currency or stock. There is no
stated maturity value, and thus there is
much greater uncertainty about the
future redemption price. Because they
rely on estimates of future economic
variables, cash flow-discounting
techniques for valuing stocks or
commodities are at best good
approximations of the fundamental value.
Current market prices are not strict
functions of those cash flows the way
bond prices are of coupon streams. At
best, they are educated guesses based on
economic analyses of supply and demand,
growth assumptions, and a lot of other
subjective measures. The upshot is that
the discounting techniques are
relatively simple, but imprecise, as
they rely on a lot of uncertain economic
variables.
4.1 EQUITY MARKETS
Secondary stock trading around the world
is arranged to force buyers and sellers
of each stock into one marketplace
in order to discover the best price for
the stock. The bottleneck design ensures
that all relevant information about the
stocks reflected in the bid and
offered prices flows into one place.
This helps establish the price
that reflects the balance of all demand
and supply for the stock. I t also
guarantees maximum liquidity of trading,
allowing traders and investors to buy
and sell nearly instantaneously
and with minimal transaction costs. The
bottleneck can be designed in two ways:
one is through a physical exchange; the
other is through a virtual exchange
which is really a network of dealers
linked by phones and computers. The
first typically creates a greater
concentration of supply and demand,
while the second offers more
competition. Primary equity sale works
roughly the same around the world. New
issuers of stock contact investment
bankers who help them navigate through
the regulatory process and help them
sell the stock certificates to
investors. In most countries new shares
have to be registered with a national
government regulator to ensure a minimal
level of information disclosure. The
stock is then offered to investors as a
fully underwritten issue or on a best
efforts basis. In the former, the
investment banking firm buys the entire
issue and then sells it to investors out
of its own inventory. In the latter, the
investment-banking firm does not take
all the resale risk. Instead, it only
sells as much of the issue as it can.
The process is the same whether the
issues are offered in an initial public
offering (IPO), where new companies sell
stock for the first time, or in a
seasoned equity offering (SEO), where
well-established firms distribute
additional shares to new investors. The
flip side of the primary market is the
repurchase of shares by the original
issuers, or a buyback. This is done in
the secondary market, but is normally
preceded by an announcement of a buyback
program. Buybacks permanently reduce the
number of shares circulated among
investors.
Compared with markets for bonds,
commodities, or derivatives, equity
markets are well understood by novice
investors. We focus on some interesting
recent developments.
Secondary markets for individual
equities in the U.S.
The largest and most important
secondary market for individual equities
is the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
The NYSE processes about 1.4 billion
shares every day and derives its
strength from a unique setup based on
specialist trading posts. The floor of
the NYSE consists of trading booths,
each trading in a handful of stocks
assigned to them. In order to provide
the maximum liquidity of trading (force
buyers and sellers to meet at one
bottleneck spot), each stock is assigned
to only one booth and one authorized
dealer for that stock—the specialist
sitting in the booth. Most orders arrive
through and are electronically matched
by a SuperDot computer system. The rest
come from the crowd of brokers gathered
around each post. Unmatched limit and
stop orders are entered into the limit
order book maintained by the specialist.
They are prioritized based on their size
and best execution price. The specialist
is in a unique position to see who wants
to buy and sell and at what prices.
Since 2002, the crowd has been allowed
to see the total size and price for each
bid and offer. The specialist enjoys a
monopoly power to trade for his own
account by observing the flow of trading
in the limit order book. For the
privilege of being able to profit from
knowing the flow of buy and sell orders
for his stock, the monopolist is
obligated to ‘‘maintain fair and orderly
market’’ (i.e., sometimes lose money
when trading imbalances occur). He is a
market maker and must post bid and offer
prices at all times. He is forced to
trade when he may not want to. This
ensures the continuity of the price and
reasonable depth of quotes. It may seem
unfair to allow the specialist to profit
at the expense of public investors, and
recent scandals over the abuse of
monopoly power by specialists may force
the NYSE to re-examine its reluctance to
adopt a dealer model. The specialist’s
monopoly profit is the price for
continuous price discovery. The Tokyo
Stock Exchange is the best example of
where machines sometimes fail to
deliver. All buyers and sellers are
forced to submit orders into the same
limit order book. Market participants
have electronic access to it (they can
see the size and the identity of the
bidders and sellers), but if at any
given time there are no market orders
and no seller wishes to trade at a price
equal to the highest bid, then no
trading occurs. At the NYSE, the
specialist must step in to trade.
There are disadvantages to this
arrangement. With the advent of decimal
trading (quoting prices in dollars and
cents as opposed to eighths and
sixteenths of dollars) and more
importantly the reduction of the tick
size (minimum price increment) to 1
cent, specialists have had incentives to
front-run investors by showing prices
only 1 cent better than the best bid or
offer. Front-running tips the balance of
fairness away from the investor and in
favor of the specialist. The NYSE has
had to police the 102 An Arbitrage Guide
to Financial Markets specialists more to
ensure that the tradeoff of monopoly
profits for continuous price making is
balanced.
Note: The rest of the chapter
is omitted.
|